Bring the glow peptide claim and its source together
A correction is most useful with the exact sentence and the paper or agency record that changes it.
The sentence is the starting point
A useful source note names the page, quotes the sentence in question and gives the published study title, DOI or agency page. If a population, route or preparation has been confused with another, say which one. Those small changes can alter the conclusion.
I welcome a correction that makes an appealing result narrower. A newly reported blend trial would also be worth examining, including the formulation it actually tested. A personal account of an effect cannot establish the same thing as a comparison study.
The full reference list is the starting record for source questions. The about page explains the site's scope.
Care questions need a different setting
This is a place for published evidence and factual corrections. It cannot assess symptoms, select an amount, arrange treatment or locate a product. Personal medical histories do not belong in a source note.
The dosage page explains why the blend has no validated human amount in the record. The legal-status page distinguishes the FDA entries from pharmacy requirements and clinical decisions. Neither page can determine an individual case.